Friday, April 29, 2005

維護家庭聯盟 & 明光社

For related discussions on the ground (or lack of ground) of "reverse discrimination", read blogger 日不落:

    維護家庭聯盟刊廣告
    反對政府同性戀民調

    【明報專訊】維護家庭聯盟收集了逾萬個團體和個人簽名,今日在部分報章刊登4版全版廣告,反對政府進行有關同性戀的大型民意調查,包括研究市民是否支持政府修改法例。有份參與的明光社表示,同性戀議題目前仍極具爭議,當局不應立法處罰不同意同性戀的市民。

    明光社總幹事蔡志森表示,共收集了9800多名個人及370多個團體的簽名。他說,同性戀在當前的社會仍具爭議,而同性戀者的權益目前已受到基本保障,故無必要採取立法的手段。聯署又強調,性傾向歧視立法有可能會分化社會和破壞家庭。

    他說,政府不應以同性戀是天性和無法改變為前設,去進行調查和立法工作,因現時仍有人對同性戀有一定保留,擔心法例會處罰對同性戀抱保留態度的人。

    Thursday, April 28, 2005

    突破機構問卷調查

    調查:網上日記增加溝通[15:34]
    2005/04/28

    一項調查顯示,七成半青少年受訪者覺得,可透過網上日記增進與朋友之間的溝通了解。

    突破機構在今年二月至三月進行問卷調查,調查對象是十至二十九歲曾經接觸過網上日記的青少年。

    調查結果顯示,有七成半受訪青少年曾經寫過網上日記。這批人當中,有七成半人認為網上日記可增加與朋友之間的了解和關心。

    被訪青少年中,有七成七人士認為,寫網上日記的原因是為了宣洩感受。

    突破研究幹事陳之虎表示,參與網上日記的人不是隱閉人士,他們只是想表達自己,家長可鼓勵青少年寫網上日記,因為可透過網上日記講他們內心的事。

    陳之虎認為,網上日記是一個可讓青少年了解自己情緒和接觸朋友的新空間。

    (記者:黎凱欣)

    香港特殊學習障礙協會

    「跨越障礙」籌款嘉年華

    【明報專訊】香港特殊學習障礙協會於1998年暑假成立,由一班特殊學習障礙兒童的家長以互助形式組織而成。為了推動社會平等學習,接納學障兒童,以及延續家長自助互助精神,該會將於5月初舉行「跨越障礙」嘉年華籌款活動,費用全免,歡迎各界人士參與...

    Wednesday, April 27, 2005

    National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy

    A guest commentary from Rick Cohen. Met Rick Cohen and visited his nonprofit, National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, while travelling in the States 3 years ago. Concentrating on regulating the institutional donors and on promoting donor education. Doing great lobbying work in the Capital City...

    Heads in the sand

    04.18.2005 -

    Nonprofit panel sidesteps critical regulatory challenges facing nonprofits.
    By Rick Cohen, executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy

    Despite having raised more than $3 million to support its work, a panel of nonprofit leaders has generated paltry and picayune accountability recommendations that will accomplish little or nothing to cure the accountability problems facing the nonprofit sector.

    These recommendations, with more to come, sidestep most of the toughest issues of self-dealing, inappropriate expenditures, exorbitant trustee fees, inadequate foundation payout, and insufficient transparency that underlie the nonprofit accountability problems that have roiled the sector for the past few years. (see more...)

    US News (from Philanthropy Journal)

    Foundation giving grows
    2004 giving reaches new high, study says.
    After two years of decline, the amount of money given by the 66,000 foundations in the U.S. increased by 6.9 percent to $32.4 billion last year, a new study says. more...

    Heart for business
    Companies that support causes win trust, study says.
    Eight in 10 Americans report that companies that support causes win their trust, a jump of 21 percent over the past eight years, a new study says. more...

    Regulatory feedback
    Groups weigh in on Senate review of nonprofits.
    Groups representing the nonprofit sector are providing their own recommendations and input to the Senate's process of investigating and regulating the charitable sector. more...


    官方慈善排名榜出爐

    官方慈善排名榜出爐
    地產商佔三成 錢其琛獲最佳示範獎

    (also see: 2005中國大陸慈善家排行榜)

    【明報專訊】「2005中國大陸慈善家排行榜」昨日在北京人民大會堂宣布, 136名善長上榜,其中以浙江省最多,佔了兩成,房地產則是慈善家最多的行業,佔了三成﹔大會還公布了「年度慈善特別獎」,前國務院副總理錢其琛獲頒「最佳示範獎」。這個排行榜得到國家民政部等支持,因而具有官方性質。組織負責人說,公布排名是為落實總理溫家寶有關國家「支持和發展慈善事業」的精神,培育和推動全民捐贈意識。

    據新浪網報道,這個榜根據6個來源排名,包括民政部和各省民政系統提供的個人捐贈數據、捐贈者自己提供的捐贈數據、 各公益機構提供的接受捐贈數據、上巿公司財務報告中相關的捐贈數據、各種公開媒體報道的捐贈數據等,同時對全國民政廳局、600多名企業家、慈善家、財富人士及百多家公益組織進行資料蒐集和採訪核查,通過對數據綜合分析,編製而成。

    136人共捐9.85億

    在「十大慈善家」中,每人捐款最少1700萬元人民幣,北京世紀金源集團董事局主席黃如論以捐出9571.5萬元而居榜首,深圳彭年集團董事長余彭年和廣東香江集團有限公司董事兼總裁翟美卿分別以7500萬元和6460萬元居第二和第三。另外,136名上榜慈善家在2004年度共捐贈9.85億元善款,平均每人捐贈724萬元。

    浙江人最多廣東居次

    浙江慈善家上榜數目居全國第一,有26人,接近整體的兩成﹔廣東、北京分別有22人和14人,遼寧有12人上榜,上海、江蘇、福建、山東、山西等也榜上有名。房地產是產生慈善家最多的行業,有41人入榜,佔上榜者三成,「十大慈善家」中有7人的主業是房地產。

    另外,年度慈善家評選不以捐贈金額為唯一依據,更注重捐贈行為本身的示範作用及善舉所帶來的社會效益。另外,有不少人的捐贈金額雖然不多甚至上不了榜,但其捐贈行為在慈善公益事業方面具有創新、示範和標誌意義,為此特別設立了年度慈善特別獎。其中前副總理錢其琛就因為將其引起海內外關注的書作《外交十記》稿費全部捐出,獲頒授「最佳示範獎」﹔北京首創集團總經理劉曉光則獲授「最具號召力獎」。

    活動組織者、中國社會工作協會會長徐瑞新表示,總理溫家寶在政府工作報告提出「支持和發展慈善事業」,而編製慈善排行榜就是為促進這政策深入落實,希望更多人參與慈善公益事業。

    Monday, April 25, 2005

    家福會綜合家居照顧服務

    削資源家居照顧服務供不應求

    【明報專訊】患有嚴重腦痙攣的女子阿嬌,堅持留在社區生活,盡量耗用最少的社會資源,卻不獲得足夠支援。她天生手腳不協調,穿衣洗澡要2個小時,說話口齒不清,幸好有患痙攣的鄰居「拔刀相助」,偶爾上門照顧,才得以在社區生活20年。近來阿嬌病情惡化,迫不得已向政府要求家居照顧服務,志願機構卻以個案「太爆」為理由,只能每兩周派人上門打掃1小時。社福界批評,傷殘服務今年撥款 雖然增加,但院舍外的服務卻削減資源...

    阿嬌近年身體變差,向所居住的觀塘區家庭福利會(家福會)申請綜合家居照顧服務,但兩年來,每兩周只獲得1小時的服務。今年2月,阿嬌不小心跌倒,傷及坐骨,活動能力變壞,要求增加家務助理時數,卻被家福會以「供不應求」理由拒絕。阿嬌艱苦地吐出幾個字﹕「好激氣﹗」

    家福會發言人承認,年初收到曾玉嬌要求增加服務,但由於當時「個案好爆」,使用率達150%,等候個案也有500個,安排服務有困難。家福會希望透過社聯向社署反映地區面對的問題。記者查詢後,家福會派社工家訪阿嬌,每月增加了1小時的服務,並每周替阿嬌提供洗衫服務。

    對於前線的「迫爆」需求,社署在回應立法會文件中指出,有關服務是由地區機構處理申請,社署沒有該服務的整體輪候數字。對於服務是否不足,社署表示﹕「機構會因地區不同服務使用者的需要,靈活運用政府撥款去為他們提供服務,並會優先處理急切個案。」而今年預算案中,亦不會增撥綜合家居服務的資源,個案成本更被削減。

    社福界議員張超雄批評,阿嬌體弱如此,仍只獲得每月3小時的打掃服務,實在是「離晒譜」。社聯復康總主任袁志海亦指出,阿嬌得到的是「不能接受的服務標準」,要求社署要檢視服務規劃。

    明報記者譚蕙芸報道


    政府倡融入社區削資違政策

    【明報專訊】社福界今年撥款增加,傷殘人士服務撥款亦上升了4%,達2.6億元。但新增資源主要用作增加傷殘人士院舍宿位﹔支援殘疾人士留在社區的服務,如家居照顧和復康巴士,經費卻被削減5%至20%。社福界批評,政府政策希望傷殘人士融入社區,撥款政策卻違背這個方向。

    05/06年社署的預算中,康復服務的開支增加了4%(1億元),其中傷殘人士宿位,今年會大增742個,開支亦增加了4%(約300萬元)。

    但分散在其他會計名目下的傷殘人士社區生活服務,來年卻被削減,例如在社署安老服務下,供傷殘人士使用的綜合家居照顧服務,來年個案成本調低了5%,名額不加。在運輸署帳目下的復康巴士經費,亦被大削兩成。

    衛生福利及食物局發言人解釋,因今年只換一部復康巴士,去年換了10部,才令撥款減少。但立法會議員張超雄批評,復康巴士殘舊,削減兩成撥款是「難以置信」。社聯復康總主任袁志海亦指出,復康巴士「一直不夠用」,減資源令他難以理解。袁志海說,傷殘人士在社區得到的支援「薄弱」,如同鼓勵他們入醫院及住 院舍,屆時政府負荷更重。張超雄指,政府的復康方向是「非院舍化」,鼓勵傷殘人士及長者回家,卻削減社區服務資源,情況荒謬。

    Friday, April 22, 2005

    現場灣仔 - 國際藝術家交流工作坊

    現場灣仔 - 國際藝術家交流工作坊(香港)

    (also see 樹上飛馬: 灣仔大舞台 24人art jamming)

    The AiR Association Limited (AiR)將會在2005年4月邀請十二位海外及十二位本地藝術家,參與這次國際藝術家交流工作坊。這兩星期工作坊以灣仔舊區作舞台,不同文化背景的藝術 家將聚首一起,探索新的意念、擴展創作的疆域。工作坊既是文化交流的機會,也是創意即興互碰的實驗室。我們將設有工作室開放時間,讓公眾與藝術家傾談,而整個工作坊的過程及成果,將於五月初為期三個星期的展覽中展出。

    國際藝術家交流工作坊不單是藝術創作,也是社區經驗的實驗。我們鼓勵參與藝術家回應社區獨特的歷史及文化,利用區內的各樣資源,包括各樣民間智慧及工人技術等,融入他們的創作。

    《現場灣仔》的合辦單位聖雅各福群會將會擔當藝術家與社區之間的橋樑,協助籌辦外展活動,串連藝術家、居民及學生結成三邊伙伴,令參加者更易了解社區、體驗生 活及創作,同時揉合藝術家和社區的創意,發揮社區資源的可能性。主辦者將與區內的店鋪及食肆等合作組織主題文化旅遊,以發展一個集合藝術、社區更新及社群經濟的創意計劃。

    國際藝術家交流工作坊(香港)屬於英國Triangle Arts Trust發起的一個國際性的藝術家工作坊聯網的成員。工作坊聯網創始於1982年,已於全球協助舉辦了超過90次工作坊,參與藝術家達2,500人。今年首次於香港舉辦,The AiR Association Limited希望能夠發展一個創新的、結合藝術家進駐及都市更新的計劃,並發展為持續性的運作模式,拓展到其他地區舉行。

    The AiR Association Limited

    The AiR Association Limited (AiR) 是香港註冊的非牟利機構,於2004年成立,由一眾具經驗的香港文化工作者組成。機構透過海外及本地的藝術家、不同的專業人士及創意社群的進駐計劃,藉以推動創意、文化交流及社區參與。國際藝術家交流工作坊是The AiR Association Limited (AiR)的揭幕活動,由工作小組運作,並由香港多位資深的藝術工作者擔任顧問。

    綠色力量 GreenPower

    綠色力量獲撥款推廣幼兒環保教育

    【明報專訊】為了加強幼兒環保教育,綠色力量與新創建集團為全港幼稚園及幼兒中心設立「幼兒綠校網」,於未來兩年,透過舉辦教師工作坊、環保活動及出版教材,協助全港1000間學校推行環境教育,從小培養小朋友愛護環境的意識。

    綠色力量行政總幹事文志森表示,該組織2002年展開「綠色學校網絡」計劃,向中、小學推行環保教育,由於獲得新創建撥款,該組織將計劃擴展至全港幼稚園及幼兒中心,目標是以兩年時間,為每間學校至少一名教職員提供訓練,如安排老師參觀環保設施,加強環保知識。

    保港會出童話書

    保港會出童話書
    政府斥內容誤導

    【明報專訊】保護海港協會印製有關保護維港的童話故事《維多利亞歷險記》,原定今日世界地球日在全港多所小學義賣,但故事內多處內容批評政府「無止境填海」、「為賣地賺錢」等,昨日遭政府公開炮轟誤導,並發信要求保港會糾正。

    《維多利亞歷險記》講述一個名叫維多利亞(Victoria)的小女孩,因為長期受污濁的海水和空氣影響,患上了環境污染綜合症,必須住在醫院裏,後來遇上一條從天而降的海豚,展開一段奇妙旅程。

    列五大爭議要求會方糾正

    故事中,有多處地方批評政府的保護維港政策,昨日房屋及規劃地政局副秘書長曹萬泰高調地在商台節目《左右大局》指故事不盡不實,批評書本雖然精美,但「下一代根據錯誤資料,怎樣去保護維港﹖」

    政府昨日就五大爭議去信保港會要求糾正,包括﹕

    一、故事批評政府無止境填海,但政府稱維港填海工程只餘下中環、灣仔及啟德機場舊址3處﹔

    二、「天星碼頭和皇后像廣場快因填海被拆」,政府稱填海不影響上述設施﹔

    三、「中環第3期填海為了賣地賺錢」,政府稱填海是興建必須的交通基建﹔

    四、「維港存在嚴重污染」,政府稱維港的溶氧量足以維持海洋生物所需﹔

    五、「填海令維港變窄浪大,易招小輪意外」,政府稱海上意外主要涉及高速行駛,填海土地的海堤已有吸浪設施。

    曹萬泰稱,希望對方自行糾正上述內容,以免誤導學生,但未有回應會否有進一步行動。

    本報曾經多次致電保護海港協會主席陸恭蕙,但截稿前仍未獲得回覆。

    Thursday, April 21, 2005

    街頭義賣籌款

    Beware...

    防善心善款被騙可致電查證

    【明報專訊】近年來慈善團體在街頭義賣籌款的活動日增,為免被無恥之徒騙去「善心善款」,市民捐款時必須謹慎。社會福利署發言人表示,慈善團體申請賣旗或義賣時,必須向社署申請牌照。若市民懷疑義賣活動有問題,可直接查看慈善團體的牌照,或致電機構查詢是否有義賣活動,若發現有人假扮義賣,市民應向警方舉報。

    發言人表示,十分鼓勵市民向慈善團體捐獻,但市民應捐助真正協助有需要人士的機構,否則被騙去金錢的同時,又遭騙去同情心。


    三婦假義賣曲奇賺私己錢

    被判感化及社會服務

    【明報專訊】3名家庭主婦手持慈善機構錢箱及膠袋,在地鐵站出口向途人兜售從奇華餅家買來的曲奇餅,名義上是為慈善機構籌款,其實卻為賺取私己錢。慈善機構收到查詢電話,3婦被揭發冒充,當場被捕,昨日在東區裁判法院承認串謀詐騙罪,分別被判感化令及社會服務令。

    5元一包買入20元出售

    3名被告李美浣(50歲)、麥建歡(53歲)及張玉蘭(57歲),被控於本年3月11日,在上環地鐵站近信德中心出口,冒認「明日棟樑教育基金有限公司」 (下稱基金)籌款,售賣曲奇餅。被告從奇華購入每包5元的曲奇餅,再以20元一包賣出,案發當日「籌」得1750.5元。

    複印籌款許可證

    案發當日下午,教育基金職員接獲公眾查詢基金是否在信德中心義賣曲奇。由於基金當日並無是項活動,於是報警。警員到瑒看見3個被告各挽綠色錢箱及機構印製的藍色膠袋,向途人兜售曲奇餅。3婦見到警員,旋即將「生財工具」放進地上的尼龍袋及布袋。警員上前將她們拘捕,從3個袋內搜出52包奇華曲奇餅、3張社署發出的慈善籌款許可證影印本、3張食環署發出的臨時販賣許可證影印。基金後來證實錢箱並非其財物,但膠袋及證件屬基金所有,平日用作籌款用途。

    3婦後來向警員承認冒充基金人員「假義賣」,籌得的款項實為私用。曾在基金任臨時員工的首被告表示,自己將涉案證件複製3份,「關照」另兩名被告。首被告昨日被判18個月感化令,另兩名被告各被判140小時社會服務令。

    涉案的明日棟樑教育基金(前稱中國助學基金)於1998年成立,並於2001年註冊為非政治、非宗教的慈善保證有限公司,推動本港及內地教育事業發展。

    Wednesday, April 20, 2005

    《嶺大》《耆康會》長者遊學團

    嶺大辦長者遊學團

    學生任導遊寓旅遊於學習

    【明報專訊】退休後生活仍可多姿多采。嶺南大學調查發現,逾九成長者希望退休後到處觀光,大部分是為了解各地歷史文化。嶺大亦看準長者的需求,首次與香港耆康老人福利會合辦長者遊學團,供50歲或以上的長者參加,參加長者需到當地大學上課及做功課,寓旅遊於學習。嶺大學生則透過「服務研習計劃」擔任導遊照顧長者,同時研究長者旅遊的未來發展。

    嶺大亞太老年學研究中心主任陳章明公布,全港首個「遊學旅遊對長者的益處」調查,03年成功訪問69名65歲或以上的長者,發現本港長者希望退休後可透過旅遊增廣見聞,95.6%的受訪者指外遊是為觀光﹔79.7%長者則表示希望了解各地的歷史文化﹔逾五成長者盼豐富學識。絕大部分受訪者預算每次外遊需花費超過2500 元。不過,逾四成長者因財政困難而無法支付外遊費用﹔57.9%長者則因身體狀難以出門。

    到大學上課交功課獲頒證書

    陳章明表示,「耆趣遊學,邊走邊學」長者遊學計劃可令長者增廣見聞,亦有助提升長者自信心及與家人溝通。遊學團並非單單觀光,長者也要做功課,如於西安蒐集當地歷史文化資料,回港後要為長者遊學研究給予意見,完成遊學團可獲當地大學頒發證書。是次遊學團中就有5名長者獲資助一半團費,負責擔任導遊及照顧其他團友。

    參與首個長者遊學團的20名長者今日出發赴西安,費用4990元。陳章明不諱言費用較市面同類型旅行團稍高300元,由於大學必須與旅行社合辦該團,導致成本上升。他期望長遠訓練一批長者及學生擔任導遊,考取證書,由大學自辦長者遊學團,或仿效澳洲的非牟利機構,將遊學團所得利潤資助長者外遊。

    United Way New Metrics

    From Philanthropy Journal: This should be the new performance standards mentioned by Darwin the other day...

    New metrics

    United Way revises benchmarks to measure community impact.
    04.14.2005 -


    United Way of America has revised its performance standards and best practices to better determine how it is improving people's lives.

    The changes are designed to reflect the organization's strategic shift from fundraising, its previous focus, to supporting the long-term needs of communities, United Way says.

    The new standards, included in a 100-page document, cover areas such as community engagement and vision, impact strategies, relationship building and brand management, and organizational leadership and governance.

    The charity is encouraging its 1,350 local affiliates to adopt the standards and benchmarks for their own operations, and says those that do will make a greater impact in their communities.

    Traditional measurements, which focused on fundraising, were last updated in 1988, United Way says.

    Monday, April 18, 2005

    兔唇裂顎協會

    兔唇裂顎是常見先天缺陷,原因未明,但部分估計與遺傳有關,每6至7百名新生嬰兒便有一名患者,但可以藉手術改善外觀。以統計處推算,14歲以下的兒童有111萬,估計全港病童有約1700名。

    兔唇童被歧視學校最嚴重

    三成曾遭排斥教師阻參與唱歌朗誦

    【明報專訊】兔唇裂顎協會一項調查發現,三成患先天性疾病「兔唇裂顎」的孩子曾遭排斥和歧視,並發現校園原來是「最歧視場所」,歧視者更包括教師和校長,包括 勸喻病童退出唱歌、朗誦、吹奏樂器等要用嘴部的課外活動。亦有同學向病童吐口水、拳打腳踢、取笑他們醜樣等,平機會指這些行為有可能已觸犯殘疾歧視條例。

    同學教師成「最歧視人物」

    兔唇裂顎協會表示,會向教統局及教協反映歧視問題,並促請加強教師職前培訓。協會本月訪問了203名唇裂顎孩子或其家長,發現曾遭受排斥和歧視的受訪者有 62人(31%),但協會主席朱阮淑儀指出,令人意外的是,「最歧視性場所」是學校(85%),其次是課外活動地點(56%)、交通公具(40%)、街上 (29%)﹔而「最歧視人物」依次為同學、朋輩、路人、教師及校長。

    家長指「名校」歧視尤其嚴重

    朱太認為「名校」歧視問 題尤其嚴重,估計是報讀人數多,學校除選擇學生成績,亦選外觀。另外,有教師勸喻病童不要參加用嘴的課外活動,如朗誦、唱歌、吹奏樂器等,但朱太反駁指出,病童口部不對稱雖會導致咬字不清晰,但其實也可以吹奏樂器和唱歌。另外,亦有些學生會孤立或打罵病童,針對病童的嘴取笑他們醜陋,改花名等。朱太指出,不少家長不敢向學校投訴,擔心孩子更被歧視。

    平機會﹕或觸犯殘疾歧視條例

    平機會發言人表示,若基於別人的殘疾而不容讓他參加活動,可能已觸犯殘疾歧視條例。發言人稱,教育應用合理遷就和輔助方式讓學生參加活動,不是拒絕他們參加﹔至於嘲笑或暴力對待童則可能是「殘疾騷擾」。平機會鼓勵家長作出投訴,但需調查才可肯定是否犯法。

    教協主席張文光指出,學校有責任對兔唇裂顎小朋友多點鼓勵,確保他們不受歧視,並要教導學生接納他們。他指出,若教師不自覺做了歧視行為,希望他們不要再犯。教統局表示,已把殘疾條例發放給學校,並與平機會舉行研討會,讓教師認識有關法例。

    兔唇裂顎是常見先天缺陷,原因未明,但部分估計與遺傳有關,每6至7百名新生嬰兒便有一名患者,但可以藉手術改善外觀。以統計處推算,14歲以下的兒童有111萬,估計全港病童有約1700名。

    Friday, April 15, 2005

    Britons neglect charities in will

    From the Guardian...
    Hong Kong fares quite well in this study.
    (also see 兩成半港人會把遺產捐慈善)


    'Britons neglect charities in will'

    Staff and agencies
    Tuesday April 12, 2005


    The British are among the least generous in the world when it comes to leaving money to charity when they die, a report claims today.

    Research from AXA showed that only 8% of Britons in work and 9% of retired people would like to leave part of their estates to good causes. Singapore had the highest proportion (40%) of workers intending to leave part of their inheritance to charities. (full story)


    UK: TV Show Involving Public to Make Charity Choice

    This is a very interesting idea from the UK, as reported by the Guardian. Should the Hong Kong Jockey Club think about partnering with one of the local broadcasters to produce a similar TV programme in Hong Kong? It should be a good way in enhancing the awareness of the public on many of the local charities.


    Viewers to vote on lottery cash

    TV show aims to get public more involved in choice of good causes

    Alison Benjamin
    Wednesday April 13, 2005
    The Guardian


    A TV show that allows the public to choose which charities receive millions of pounds of lottery cash is the latest move to popularise the national lottery.

    ITV is in discussions with the lottery distributor, the Big Lottery Fund (BLF), to launch a programme coinciding with the station's 50th anniversary celebrations in September. The programme, with the working title The People's Millions, is expected to give viewers the chance to vote for the charity most deserving of support, with sums as high as £50m on offer.

    An ITV spokeswoman says: "It is very early days. We are are in discussions with the Big Lottery Fund for some sort of programming around our 50th anniversary, but we don't yet know the format." A game show is one of the ideas being considered. (full story)


    可持續發展公民議會

    可持續發展委員會被責未盡把關責任

    【明報專訊】「可持續發展公民議會」(下稱公民議會)周二去信身兼可持續發展委員會主席的署理行政長官 曾蔭權,要求改革及開放可持續發展委員會,讓市民參與選訂香港未來可持續發展的研究方向,以挽救委員會的公信力。公民議會主席黎廣德昨日接受訪問時批評, 委員會過去兩年未盡責把關,堅拒評論違背可持續理念的發展項目,「與公眾的期望有很大落差」。

    稱拒評違背理念項目未「挺身而出」

    新一屆可持續發展委員會將於下周一投入工作,委員會主席由政務司長曾蔭權擔任,鄭維健任副主席,連委員一共18人。過去兩年,委員會按港府建議的廢物處理、 再生能源利用及都市規劃3個範疇,為香港籌劃可持續發展策略。結合環保、社福和商界等學術及專業代表而成的民間組織「可持續發展公民議會」主席黎廣德昨日 為成立兩年的可持續發展委員會派發「成績單」,評論委員會的功過。他表示,委員會過去兩年令可持續發展成為港人的話題,亦採用相對政府較突破的方式諮詢公 眾意見,值得讚賞。不過,他認為委員會過去兩年並未挺身而出,選擇拒絕評論違背可持續發展的項目工程,與市民期望相差甚遠。

    黎廣德稱,要挽救委員會在市民心目中的公信力,必須改革委員會的委任方式、開放會議和讓市民參與選訂研究政策的方向。公民議會已去信主席曾蔭權,要求改革及開放可持續 發展委員會。公民議會於信中建議,委員會應藉7月港府組織新班底的時機,參考聯合國的國際組織,只有一半委員由政府委任,另一半則公開提名,增加委員會的公眾認受性。

    黎廣德﹕政策應先交委會審議才上行會

    此外,委員會亦應改革成像環諮會的諮詢架構,所有重大政策必先由委員會審議,認為政策符合可持續發展原則後,才上行政會議拍板,此舉可讓政府政策更早諮詢公眾,避免日後的官民衝突。黎廣德表示,市民有權一同選訂未來優先研究 的方向,但並不一定要透過公投才可蒐集市民意見。他稱,新一屆委員會可透過定期舉辦公眾聽證會,聆聽市民希望優先研究的範疇。

    明報記者黃綺湘

    Wednesday, April 13, 2005

    撒瑪利亞基金

    ...當局期望在未來兩年,透過醫療融資和改變醫管局資助安排等,一併研究基金的長遠撥款安排,「我們不期望政府一力承擔所有赤字,未來會加強推廣基金,希望可吸引更多私人單位捐款」

    撒瑪利亞基金擬注2億公帑

    援助貧困病人赤字4000萬

    【明報專訊】隨人口老化及醫療費用高昂,用以資助貧窮病人購買醫療用品和藥物的撒瑪利亞基金,截至上月底已出現近4000萬元的赤字,在開支持續上升下,預期至07/08年度基金的累積赤字將高達2億元。為維持基金營運,政府計劃向立法會爭取2億元的一次過撥款,應付基金未來2年需要,且不排除要再次追加撥款的可能。

    衛 生福利及食物局和醫院管理局的消息人士又透露,由於現時不少超出審批標準的申請個案,須由醫務社工作彈性處理,故當局將釐訂更清晰的審批準則,確保個案得 到一致處理,「會考慮更多因素,如申請人家中是否有小孩和老人須要供養,和藥物費用佔家庭開支比例等」。他強調無意收緊標準,過去個案獲批的比率亦十分 高。

    藥物成本高昂加重基金負擔

    衛福局消息人士表示,為貧困病人提供援助的撒瑪利亞基金,過去一直主要靠私人捐款營運,基本上可維持收支平衡。但獲批的個案在過去5年增加約七成,每年基金總開支由2000/01年度的3490萬,大增至04/05年度的9920萬,增加近兩倍。

    截至上月底,基金赤字已達3830萬元,政府估計在未來3個財政年度將持續出現赤字,至07/08年度,基金累積赤字更將達逾2億元(見附表)。為應付未來2年的開支,當局將向立法會財務委員會申請撥款2億元,以維持基金運作。

    消息人士解釋,令基金開支大增有四大原因,其一用以治療血癌的「加以域」,去年度申請宗數大增,加上其成本極高昂,每名病人每年花費逾20萬元,單要應付這一藥物的開支,已加重基金負擔逾2000萬元。其他藥物的開支亦大增超過兩倍,結果令本年度的藥物開支大幅升。

    人 口老化亦令長期病患者大增,單是「通波仔」手術、購買自發性體內去顫器和起搏器的資助申請,已由上年度的1882宗升至今年的2268宗,預計有關數字會 持續上升。而這些手術和器材的成本,平均由1萬至15萬元不等,一年的總開支約7000萬元。另坊間一個資助貧窮病人、每年最高撥款2500萬元的慈善計 劃於去年結束,其擔子將落在基金上。

    當局期望在未來兩年,透過醫療融資和改變醫管局資助安排等,一併研究基金的長遠撥款安排,「我們不期望政府一力承擔所有赤字,未來會加強推廣基金,希望可吸引更多私人單位捐款」。

    希望更多私人捐款

    消息人士強調,此預算已把即將推出的標準藥物名冊所帶來影響計算在內,但現難判斷2億元撥款是否「夠使」。他指目前只能靠推測出來的數字要求撥款,因此「不能排除2年內再追加撥款的可能性」。

    Tuesday, April 12, 2005

    中国富豪为什么没有爱心

    轉錄自《中国报道》...

    中国富豪为什么没有爱心
    沈爱华

      5月12日,《福布斯》在上海发布了“2004中国慈善榜”。而数天前的4月29日,曾经为《福布斯》打工的胡润也公布了《2004中国大陆慈善家排行榜》。从两个慈善榜对中国民营企业捐赠情况所做的罗列可以看出,中国的富豪们并不愿意通过捐赠来献出爱心。

       《福布斯》慈善榜的慈善桂冠,是捐款额达3447万元的上海瀛通集团老板陈伟峰;而在“排榜专业户”胡润所做的慈善榜上,摘得冠军的是世纪金源投资公司 董事长黄如论,捐赠金额为2.1 亿元。两个榜单上的慈善冠军捐赠额度,高达5倍的差距,不能不让人侧目。而两个慈善榜到底在多大程度上揭示了中国民营企业的真实捐赠现状,不免也让人对之 打上一个问号。 (full article)

    2005中國大陸慈善家排行榜

    2005中國大陸慈善家排行榜已可於《百富/歐元雜誌》中找到。其實《歐元雜誌》(Euromoney China)於2004年已發布中國的慈善家排行榜,那一期更以《寻找中国的卡耐基》作專題報道。




    官方推慈善家排行榜

    【明報專訊】國家民政部透露,一份與財富排行榜對應的「2005中國大陸慈善家排行榜」即將發布,同時還將公布中國十大慈善人物。這是內地官方首度為慈善家排名,入選對象包括內地公民及在大陸或主要捐贈對象在大陸的港澳台居民,可以是企業家、官員、公眾人物、普通公民。

    據主辦單位披露,這個排行榜數據來源主要有5個途徑﹕中國民政部門提供的個人捐贈數據﹔國家稅務部門的個人捐贈免稅數據﹔捐贈者自己提供的捐贈數據﹔各公益機構提供的接受捐贈數據﹔傳媒報道的捐贈數據。

    Thursday, April 07, 2005

    Upcoming Events

    From ARNOVA e-news (vol. 3, no. 2)...

    2005

    May 16-17
    10th Annual Nonprofit Workout, “Keeping it Real: Accountable to Whom?”,
    Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Cambridge, Mass.; Contact: www.tsne.org.

    June 2-4
    The 15th Annual International Conference of The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership,
    Indianapolis, Ind.; Contact: Greenleaf Center for Servant-Leadership at www.greenleaf.org.

    June 8-11
    5th National Conference on Black Philanthropy, “Building a Future Worthy of Our Past,”
    The Hilton Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minn.; Contact: www.ncfbp.net.

    July 11-13
    American Marketing Association Nonprofit Marketing Conference,
    Mandarin Oriental, Washington, D.C.; Contact: www.marketingpower.com/nonprofit.

    July 14-17
    Alliance for Nonprofit Management/National Council of Nonprofit Associations Joint Conference, "The Communities We Serve: Building Capacity for Impact,"
    Chicago, Ill.; Contact: Alliance for Nonprofit Management at www.allianceonline.org or National Council of Nonprofit Associations at www.ncna.org.

    August 10-13
    Association of Professional Researchers for Advancement (APRA) Annual International Conference, “The Campaign Trail: Research Rich, Fundraising Focused,”
    Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego, Calif.; Contact: www.aprahome.org.

    August 25-26
    The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University 18th Annual Symposium, “Women and Philanthropy: Gaining Momentum,”
    Indianapolis, Ind.; Contact: www.philanthropy.iupui.edu.

    September 8-9
    IT for the Non-IT Executive, “Understanding IT and Leveraging Its Use,”
    Cambridge, Mass.; Contact: MIT Sloan School of Management at http://mitsloan.mit.edu/execed.

    October 23-25
    Independent Sector Annual Conference,
    Washington, D.C.; Contact: www.independentsector.org.

    November 2-5
    2005 International Conference on Volunteer Administration,
    Adam’s Mark Hotel—Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Fla.; Contact: Association for Volunteer Administration at www.avaintl.org.

    November 17-19
    34th Annual ARNOVA Conference,
    Capital Hilton, Washington, D.C.; Contact: ARNOVA at 317-684-2120; website: www.arnova.org.

    December 1-2
    IT for the Non-IT Executive, “Understanding IT and Leveraging Its Use,”
    Cambridge, Mass.; Contact: MIT Sloan School of Management at http://mitsloan.mit.edu/execed.

    Recently Released Books

    From ARNOVA e-news (vol. 3, no. 2)...

    Disaster Recovery Planning for Nonprofits (2003)
    Michael K. Robinson; Hamilton Books (www.hamilton-books.com), 112 pages
    Michael Robinson’s book provides us with a way to help our own organizations prepare for disasters large or small. Robinson pushes us to think beyond the natural disaster, and begin to plan for any disaster, war, equipment failure, corruption or the loss of key personnel.

    Grassroots Grants: An Activist’s Guide to Grantseeking (Second Edition) (2004)
    Andy Robinson, with contributions from Jean Lewis, John Pomeranz, and Wendy Wilson; Jossey-Bass (www.josseybass.com), 259 pages

    Although this book is intended for social activists, the lessons presented by Andy Robinson can be beneficial to anyone seeking grants. Robinson presents the reality of what an organization can expect in the process of grantseeking, and what is expected of the organization.

    How To Lobby at Intergovernmental Meetings (2004)
    Felix Dodds with Michael Strauss; Earthscan Publications (www.earthscan.co.uk), 169 pages

    Dodds sets forth to answer a major challenge to map the process of how individuals or organizations can lobby intergovernmental meetings. The book offers tips for the stakeholder or governmental official, who may be at a loss concerning where to start in this process.

    Special Events: Proven Strategies for Nonprofit Fundraising (2nd Edition) (2004)
    Alan L. Wendroff; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (www.wiley.com), 244 pages

    One of the best fundraising strategies for nonprofits is bringing people together at an event. Wendroff draws upon his years of experience to provide guidance that even a seasoned professional can find useful.

    The Good Corporate Citizen: A Practical Guide (2004)
    Doris Rubenstein; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (www.wiley.com), 200 pages

    Rubenstein sets forth how a corporation wishing to give can do so effectively. While this book offers a step-by-step guide, it provides flexibility to the plans to allow companies of all shapes and sizes to use it successfully. The book lays out the benefits to the community and company that can be made by good corporate citizenship.

    The Professional Edge: Competencies in Public Service (2004)
    James S. Bowman, Jonathan P. West, Evan M. Berman, and Montgomery Van Wart; M. E. Sharpe (www.mesharpe.com), 154 pages

    As public service employees and contractors (nonprofit and private) are required to have more specific skills, their jobs have become professionalized. They need to have specialized knowledge and skills to meet the needs of the public that they serve, and the complex problems they are expected to solve. The need for nonprofit sector employees to gain those same competencies becomes increasingly important with increased levels of contracting out by federal, state, and local governments.

    Financial Leadership for Nonprofit Executives: Guiding Your Organization to Long-term Success (2005)
    Jeanne Peters and Elizabeth Schaffer; Amherst H. Wilder Foundation (www.wilder.org), 152 pages

    This book gives executive directors the framework, specific language, and processes needed to create an effective nonprofit business that strikes the balance between mission and money.

    Managing at the Leading Edge (2005)
    Mike Hudson; Jossey-Bass (www.josseybass.com), 304 pages

    Find out how the most successful nonprofit organizations are flourishing in a difficult social and economic climate. Hudson takes the best practices from nonprofits around the country and distills them into this practical guide for leading and managing nonprofit organizations.

    Leadership for the Common Good (2005)
    Barbara C. Crosby and John M. Bryson; Jossey-Bass (www.josseybass.com), 496 pages

    Learn how to be a better leader in this revised and updated leadership classic. Crosby and Bryson offer new insights and guidance to a new generation of leaders and aspiring leaders.

    650 Essential Nonprofit Law Questions Answered (2005)
    Bruce R. Hopkins; Jossey-Bass (www.josseybass.com), 448 pages

    This book provides essential guidance for those interested in starting new nonprofits, as well as valuable advice for directors of established organizations.

    Effective Fundraising for Nonprofits (2005)
    Ilona Bray; Nolo (www.nolo.com), 275 pages

    Nolo’s new guide to fundraising for nonprofits covers everything from working with individual donors to soliciting grants to starting a side business.

    Starting & Building a Nonprofit (2005)
    Peri H. Pakroo; Nolo (www.nolo.com), 300 pages

    In practical steps, Starting & Building a Nonprofit guides you from deciding whether to form a nonprofit, to engaging in strategic planning, managing your finances and taxes, developing a website, and creating a board.

    Tuesday, April 05, 2005

    Who is giving?

    How is this compared to the case of middle class giving in Hong Kong?
    Who is giving?
    Most Americans give, but the low-income give more, study says.

    03.30.2005 -

    Almost all Americans donate to charity, but those with lower incomes are more generous with their donations than the wealthy, a new study says.

    "Freelanthropy Charitable Giving Index," published by Freelanthropy, which provides online communications services for nonprofits, analyzes the giving behavior of a cross-section of 1,000 Americans.

    More than nine in 10 Americans give $100 or more a year, the study says, with more than four in 10 giving $100 to $1,000 and only about one in 20 giving $5,000 or more.

    Lower-income Americans are most generous in their giving, based on percentage of income, the study says, with four in 10 people who make less than $25,000 giving $100 to $1,000 last year.

    Older people are more generous than younger ones, the study says, with one-quarter of donations in the $1,000-to-$5,000 range coming from people ages 45 to 54, compared to 1.3 percent from those 18 to 24, while those ages 55 to 64 gave almost half the gifts of $100 to $1,000.

    One in three self-employed people gave $1,000 to $5,000, more than any other group by employment, while retirees gave the fewest of the larger gifts, the study says.
    However, at the lower giving level of $100 to $1,000, retirees were the largest group of givers, with about half giving at that level.

    Gift planning

    Community foundations are planned-giving resource for small nonprofits.
    03.29.2005 -

    As always, what a great issue [Special report on planned giving, 03.23.05].

    I really stay up to speed on what is going on through you and Philanthropy Journal. Thank you.

    On the subject of "Getting started," just for the record, smaller nonprofits or nonprofits without planned-giving expertise can create an endowment for their organization at almost any community foundation.

    They then have the full array of community-foundation services available to their donors.

    It is a wonderful option in the scenario you described.

    Such a fund takes about 10 minutes to set up.

    Information about community foundations and a locator to find them are available on the web.

    Mary Holmes, executive director,
    Cumberland Community Foundation,
    Fayetteville, N.C

    Monday, April 04, 2005

    CHALLENGES OF MANAGING THE THIRD SECTOR

    THE 5TH WORKSHOP ON THE CHALLENGES OF MANAGING THE THIRD SECTOR

    The purpose of the workshop 'The challenges of managing the third sector' is to present and discuss in a stimulating environment high quality research papers on all relevant aspects of managing small and large non profit organisations. Both theoretical and empirical papers, including excellent case studies and papers written by senior managers/ policymakers/ practitioners, will be welcomed.

    Suggestions for specific domains to be dealt with are :
    · policy constraints on npo management
    · funding constraints on npo management
    · ethical issues versus commercialisation and commodification
    · the introduction of private sector managerial techniques in npos
    · the role of sponsors
    · problems of fundraising
    · functional management of npos : accounting, finance, marketing, human resources
    · strategy and npo objectives
    · npo management in transition economies
    · inter-disciplinary approaches to the challenges of the Third Sector

    Those who are interested in presenting a full paper should submit it before April 15, 2005.

    和諧之家

    和諧之家求助男士升兩成

    設熱線輔導施虐者

    【明報專訊】本報昨日報道,本港4個庇護中心之一的和諧之家,新一年度的求助婦女人數上升兩成。最新數字亦顯示,求助的男士人數,今年亦同樣上升近兩成。和諧之家開設熱線,為向婦女施虐後的男士提供輔導,2004至05年有115宗 個案,較2003年96宗增加19.8%。

    宣傳多公眾懂求助

    負責男士服務的湛志豪稱,男士向妻子施虐後,會感到擔心及疑慮,希望找人分享。他們也希望及早疏導男士的情緒,否則繼續使用暴力發泄。他稱個案增加,相信是宣傳較多,公眾懂得求助方法。

    入住和諧之家兒童增兩成

    而入住和諧之家的兒童人數亦有升幅,去年有193名小童入住,今年度有224人,上升了18.5%。和諧之家總幹事王鳳儀指兒童受家庭暴力影響嚴重,部分兒 童入住庇護中心後,會仿效父親暴力行為。因此,機構今年會加強兒童服務,設「和諧速遞」專車,巡迴學校向兒童講解和諧信息。

    九成個案與經濟有關

    她又指受虐個案急增,情嚴重,九成個案與經濟問題有關,有關家庭面對失業、待業、領取綜援等,未必受惠於經濟環境改善。她稱服務需求增加,政府今年未有增加資源,需向賽馬會增加撥款。但她稱財政緊絀下,令新服務未能開展,例如醫院跟進、施虐者輔導等。

    Saturday, April 02, 2005

    CCSG e-Newsletter (4th Issue)

    Check out the latest e-newsletter here.

    ASEF

    I'm supposed to participate in this conference and present the Hong Kong paper, which I compiled jointly with Josephine Lee (of SJS), and with research support provided by the St James' Settlement Research Team.


    EVENT: Asian Social Entrepreneurship Forum: Roots And Roadmaps
    Dates: 19-20 February
    Venue: Taipei, Taiwan
    Organizers: Conference of Asian Foundations and Organizations (CAFO)

    Thirty-five social entrepreneurs gathered at a conference entitled 『Roots and Roadmaps' in Taipei on 19-20 February 2005. The objectives of the gathering, organized by the Conference of Asian Foundations and Organizations (CAFO), were to discuss and contribute to the evolving social entrepreneurship framework developed by CAFO over the preceding three years; to increase appreciation of the roots, contexts and characteristics of social entrepreneurship in Asian societies; and to discuss the issues and challenges the movement faces in the region and how CAFO might serve as a platform to address them.


    Social Entrepreneurship in Asia:
    Origins and Roles


    The session on indigenizing social entrepreneurship in Asian societies found the roots of social entrepreneurship in community cooperation on such things as house construction and transfer, agricultural production and the barter system, which were common in India, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. In more recent times, self-help groups and cooperatives had grown up in response to the failure of post-colonial states to provide adequate level of goods and services. Development NGOs had also arisen, funded either by overseas development assistance or western donors more generally in the case of poorer countries (such as India, Indonesia and the Philippines) or by government and corporate donors in the case of more affluent countries (such as Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore).

    Social entrepreneurship evolved in both cases as NPOs were obliged to diversify their sources of funding following a general downturn in funding. Participants felt that social entrepreneurship had effectively become the art of developing and managing enterprises with multiple bottom lines and identified a number of potential roles for it in different areas of Asia:

    * to address the financial sustainability of development programmes and institutions where sources of grant funding are drying up and create trends towards more market-based approaches among NPOs;

    * to empower economically the poor/marginalized in underdeveloped/developing economies (India, Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia);

    * to advocate for a more humane, responsive market economy (for example, fair trade, partnership with corporations to promote corporate citizenship while tapping their expertise and resources for social enterprise initiatives);

    * to provide services for businesses to help them provide for a larger section of the population (as in the case of Taiwan);

    * to integrate disadvantaged, vulnerable and marginalized sectors into the mainstream economy in developed market economies or affluent societies (Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan);

    * to ensure a more humane shift to market economies in socialist countries (such as China and Vietnam).

    This last point was felt to be of particular importance for future research projects.

    The challenges of social entrepreneurship

    The conference identified a number of major challenges through the experiences presented by individual social enterprises. Many of these were to do with managing the conflicts creating by running a business and at the same time providing a service (how, for instance, to measure non-financial bottom lines or to determine the cost-benefit ratio of a service or programme). There was also the question of mainstreaming: organizations engaged in fair trade begin with niche markets but, sooner or later, need to be able to compete in the open market. Another issue is scaling up, that is, enhancing the participation of marginalized sectors and the benefits of such enhanced participation in the market. Here again, the major underlying question was seen as being how to reconcile the commercial and the social elements of a social enterprise.

    The relevance of social entrepreneurship in the aftermath of the tsunami

    The fourth session described the work of Dompet Dhuafa (DD) (Indonesia) and the Thai Volunteer Service (TVS) in the relief and rehabilitation of tsunami victims. DD implements a community recovery programme called the Kampung (Village) Reform, which has economic, social development, education, health and infrastructural elements. TVS spearheaded the formation of the Taskforce for Southern Community and Ecological Recovery composed of over a hundred Thai NGOs that address the needs of women, children and local fisherfolk and questions of labour, religion and disability, among others.

    The social entrepreneurship agenda for CAFO


    Delegates proposed the following action plan for CAFO. In respect of tsunami relief and reconstruction, CAFO can be a platform for the exchange and sharing of ideas and experiences about rehabilitation and reconstruction work using social entrepreneurship models.

    Social entrepreneurship is a key strategy for sustainable development. In order to further its promotion and development, CAFO can help organize and support future initiatives like the Roots and Roadmaps conference. Sectors to be lobbied are government, corporations, CSOs outside of CAFO, and the public. CAFO also has a capacity-building role, bringing organizations and resources together and helping build a body of knowledge.

    Finally, CAFO should develop further overall strategies in social entrepreneurship based on the specific strategies in each country; conduct action research based on the challenges outlined above; develop further capacity-building tools; and set up a website and mailing list for the sharing of information.

      Friday, April 01, 2005

      社區投資共享基金

      共享基金主席[10:25]
      2005/04/01

      政府今日公布再度委任鄔維庸醫生為社區投資共享基金委員會(委員會)主席。

      現任成員高靜芝將獲委任為副主席,她自三年前委員會成立以來一直擔任成員。

      另外,五名人士獲委任為新成員,他們分別是鄒正林、關則輝、林正財、劉嘉時和吳志榮。

      以上全部委任/再度委任將於二○○五年四月一日生效,全部任期為三年。

      此外,七名現任成員獲再度委任兩年,他們是陳思堂、郭鍵勳、梁文傑、曹啟樂、王紹爾、余秀珠和阮曾媛琪。

      三億元的社區投資共享基金在二○○二年成立,以鼓勵市民互助互愛,進一步建立社區支援和網絡,以及推動社區參與。委員會負責審批申請,以及向政府提供有關香港社會資本發展的建議。

      Strategic Grants-Management Software

      [advertorial from Philanthropy Journal]

      Strategic software

      Optimizing grants-management software can help reach goals faster.

      By Kathy Krais

      [Publisher's note: The Philanthropy Journal does not necessarily endorse the opinions, products or services offered or cited in this paid advertorial.]

      The JEHT Foundation was established in April 2000 to support its donors' interests in human rights, social justice and community building.

      The foundation makes a combination of multi-year and one-time grant commitments for general operating support, project support, capacity building, and special needs and opportunities as they arise in its fields of interest.

      JEHT Foundation has used GIFTS® grants management software from MicroEdge Inc. since its inception. However, the foundation realized it would need more detailed grants and organizational data to conduct more thorough analysis and planning, including creating specific cash-flow reports.

      Debra Kendall, JHET Foundation's administrative director, called MicroEdge, which recommended that the foundation consider an optimization analysis to examine their use of GIFTS and ensure they are getting the most from GIFTS.

      The optimization analysis took three days. After an onsite examination of why the foundation uses GIFTS, evaluation and discussion of the objectives of the optimization analysis, and review of the completed report, MicroEdge spent time with the foundation staff to demonstrate additional ways to use GIFTS.

      The reporting problem that initially prompted the JEHT Foundation's call to MicroEdge occurred due to the way grants data were input into GIFTS, and the coding structure that was being used.

      The foundation resolved these issues by reorganizing its coding structure, adding more codes to cover various request types and status, enabling them to show all the detailed steps of a grant instead of just broad ranges, allowing the foundation to easily see how many organizations have submitted proposals, how many have been rejected, and how many have been funded.

      "We are now using GIFTS as an organization-wide solution for the whole foundation, rather than only as a grants process tools for the program staff," says Marjorie Louis, JHET Foundation's grants administrator.

      "Since our program managers often are on the run and can't always be tracked down, GIFTS enables us to access all the information we need, regardless of whether they're in the office or on the road."

      Once the JEHT Foundation has implemented all of the suggested changes to their current process, it plans to go back and adjust past data records, to afford a better historical view.

      Then they'll look ahead to the future.

      "Once you've started using GIFTS," says Marjorie, "it's a good idea to step back and utilize this service, to see whether the system is being used to its fullest potential."